Psychological evidence that makes an impact.
Proving the existence and severity of psychological injury requires more than a diagnosis. That's where our evaluations bring value to complex records, by turning a convoluted symptoms history into systematic analytical reports that survive oppositional scrutiny and strengthen your case.
Call Us When You Need Us
Attorneys, insurers, and advocates bring us cases when psychological injury sits at the center of a dispute. Whether it’s a question of damages, eligibility, or credibility, we can translate any situation with psychological impact into clear language.
Personal Injury Claims
Documenting the emotional and cognitive toll of accidents or injuries. Evaluations clarify the scope of damages and position evidence for negotiation or trial.
Disability Claims
Structured assessments that link symptoms to function and eligibility criteria. Useful for SSDI/SSI, private LTD, and appeals.
Workplace Accommodations
Reports that map psychiatric conditions to functional needs in employment contexts, strengthening ADA requests and employer negotiations.
College Accommodations
Evaluations that document psychiatric diagnoses and academic impact. Crafted for higher education, 504, and IEP contexts.
Settlement Preparation
Concise damages documentation that supports negotiation and mediation without requiring the cost or scope of a full IME.
Expert Rebuttals
Targeted critiques of opposing expert reports. We identify flaws, highlight oversights, and offer structured counter-interpretations attorneys can rely on.
Workers' Compensation
Independent opinions on the psychological sequelae of workplace injuries. Clear documentation of impairment and functional effects.
Insurance Denials
Objective reviews and clarifying evaluations for denied claims. Reports address errors, omissions, and reasoning with clear alternatives.
OUR APPROACH
Each evaluation is built for clarity, impartiality, and legal utility. We gather records, integrate standardized tools, and apply DSM-5 criteria with attention to inclusion and exclusion factors. Reports are structured to anticipate scrutiny. Findings are presented in plain language and backed by methods that withstand critical review or cross-examination.
Case law, standards, and strategy insights for those who work with psychological evidence.
